A new study from Harvard provides information to those banking on Twitter to help market, promote, and sustain women’s sports. Here are some snippets if you don’t want to read the entire article or the post on Harvard Business Publishing:
1. “Just 10% of Twitter users generate more than 90% of the content”…these people are called “super users”. Super Users can now make money through a just launched service called Super Chirp
2. “…very, very few people tweet and the Nielsen data says very, very few people listen consistently.”
3. “Among Twitter users, the median number of lifetime tweets per user is one”
4. “…an average man was almost twice as likely to follow another man than a woman, despite the reverse being true on other social networks. The sort of content that drives men to look at women on other social networks does not exist on Twitter,” said Mr. Heil (one of the researchers). “By that I mean pictures, extended articles and biographical information.”
Twitter may be reaching a certain audience, but probably not males who don’t opt in and follow women’s sport.
Take home message for female athletes and women’s professional sport leagues: Use sexy pictures you download onto TwitPic to garner millions of followers (given the stack of research on how female athletes are sexualized in the sport media, such a picture shouldn’t be hard to find), then start charging your followers money to follow your Tweets. Voila!...instant revenue!
Given Heil’s findings, this may unfortunately lend some credence to the “sex sells” women’s sport debate (for more on this debate click here and here). But… I still contend that sex sells sex, not women’s sport.
What? You mean just throwing your brand or women’s sport league on Twitter won’t increase ticket sales? *insert sarcasm*
Thanks for sharing Nicole!
LikeLike
Really interesting stuff. The way I hear about Twitter it seems like EVERYONE is using it at all times EVERYWHERE. Its funny that people aren’t using it that much, and that guys don’t follow girls basically cause they can’t see pictures. Definitely doesn’t seem like a way to market anything in a way that wouldn’t trivialize the athletes.
LikeLike